Ibn Sina's Floating Man: Ibn Sina (980–1037 CE) gave a famous thought experiment. Imagine a man created fully formed — but suspended in the air, in total darkness, blindfolded, with no sensory experience at all: he cannot feel his limbs, cannot hear, cannot smell, cannot taste, and cannot even feel his own body. Question: does this man know anything? Ibn Sina's answer: yes, with absolute certainty he knows one thing — "I exist." Even without a single sensory experience, the "I" that is aware of its own existence cannot doubt that it exists. Conclusion: the "I" — the soul — is not identical with the body. It is a non-material reality, distinct from the body.
Descartes, 700 years later: Descartes reached the same insight with his Cogito — "I think, therefore I am" — 700 years after Ibn Sina. Both arrive at the certainty of self-existence independent of sensory input. But there is a crucial difference: Descartes used the cogito to establish consciousness and then struggled to prove the external world. Ibn Sina used the Floating Man specifically to prove the soul as a distinct, immaterial substance — and then moved on to prove Allah's existence from there. Ibn Sina's move is more philosophically ambitious and more productive.
Heidegger: Being itself was forgotten: Martin Heidegger (1889–1976) said Western philosophy from Plato onward studied beings — rocks, trees, humans, even God as theology conceives Him — but forgot to ask about Being itself (Sein): the sheer act of existing, the "there-ness" that underlies every being. This forgetting — Seinsvergessenheit — is the deepest crisis of Western thought. Remarkably, Mulla Sadra begins with exactly the same insight: philosophers before him studied essences (Mahiyya) and forgot that Wujud is the primary reality. Henry Corbin saw the parallel clearly: Heidegger's Sein and Mulla Sadra's Wujud are two names for the same discovery — that being-there is more fundamental than any essence. But Heidegger stopped at the question; Asalat al-Wujud is the answer.
Thrown or called? Dasein vs Nafs: Heidegger calls the human being Dasein (Being-there): it finds itself thrown into a world it did not choose, always reaching toward its possibilities, and its final possibility is death. The Islamic Nafs (soul) shares this dynamism — Haraka Jawhariyya means the soul is its journey, exactly as Dasein is its possibilities. But the Nafs has three decisive additions: a divine origin — not thrown but called ("And I breathed into him of My spirit"); a divine purpose — Khalifat Allah, the vicegerent of Allah; and a divine destiny — "To your Lord is the return." Heidegger's Dasein is thrown, choosing, dying. The Islamic Nafs is called, journeying, returning. One ends in an abyss; the other ends in Allah.
The Buddhist challenge: no self at all: Buddhism's Anatman says there is no permanent self at all — the "I" is only a label for a changing stream. Islam answers firmly: the Nafs is real, immaterial, created by Allah, with a unique identity given by Allah. It carries the divine breath, is fully accountable before Allah, and will be resurrected as this specific individual. The same freedom Sartre celebrated — the human being genuinely chooses and creates itself through its choices — is real in Islam too. But it is not freedom in a void. It is freedom to actualise a given nature: Fitra, Khalifat Allah, and the capacity for Al-Insan al-Kamil (the Perfect Human). Sartre's freedom has no direction; Islamic freedom walks the Maqamat (stations) toward the potential Allah placed in the soul.
Example
Imagine two travellers on the same road. One was dropped on the road in the dark, with no map, no idea where he came from, and the road ending at a cliff. The other was sent on the road by someone who loves him, with a map in his pocket and a home waiting at the end.
Both walk the same road, both choose every step freely. But the second traveller's journey means something completely different — because he knows where he came from, why he is walking, and where he is going. That is the difference between Dasein and the Nafs.
Key Terms
- Nafs (نفس) — the soul; real, immaterial, created by Allah, called, journeying, and returning
- Floating Man (معلق انسان) — Ibn Sina's thought experiment proving the soul's independence from the body
- Dasein (ڈازائن) — Heidegger's name for the human being: thrown, choosing, dying
- Haraka Jawhariyya (حرکت جوهریہ) — substantial motion; the soul IS its journey
Quran or Hadith
Quran 15:29 — "And I breathed into him of My spirit." — to be checked. The Nafs comes from Allah and carries the divine breath — it is not thrown into the world without an origin.
Fresh diagram to be drawn: Two travellers on the same road: one dropped in the dark with no map, the other sent with a map and a home waiting — labelled "Dasein: thrown, choosing, dying" and "Nafs: called, journeying, returning".
- Ibn Sina's Floating Man proves the soul knows "I exist" without any senses — 700 years before Descartes.
- Heidegger asked about Being itself; Mulla Sadra answered with Asalat al-Wujud.
- The Nafs is called, journeying, and returning — not thrown into the world without origin or purpose.